Protectionism in Australia's 'world city'

by Sam Roggeveen - 16 June 2009 4:18PM

The Government of New South Wales has caved in to the union movement and enacted protectionist measures in its latest budget:

The office of the NSW Treasurer, Eric Roozendaal, yesterday confirmed the budget would offer local firms a 20 per cent premium in bidding for tenders compared to foreign bidders. The policy is expected to apply to about $4 billion worth of goods and services supplied to the Government, which insists the measures will not breach World Trade Organisation rules. Mr Roozendaal conceded the policy could lead to "some increased cost", for the Government. "But frankly, if it is going to support local jobs … we think it's appropriate," Mr Roozendaal told Sky News.

$4 billion is a modest sum in national terms, but if, as federal Trade Minister Simon Crean warns in the same article, this move encourages Australia's trade partners to adopt similar measures, the cost will be much higher.

Apart from the material damage, the symbolism is atrocious. Successive New South Wales Governments have branded the state capital, Sydney, as Australia's 'world city'. Decisions like this one make a mockery of that claim.

Selected Interpreter posts also appear in:

 
Business Spectator Caing online The Diplomat
 

Keep up-to-date with The Interpreter through:

iPhone App   iPhone App

RSS Feed   The Interpreter RSS Feed

Email Digest  

To receive a digest of posts from The Interpreter via email, enter your email address:

Receive a daily digest ->
Receive a weekly digest ->

Preview   |   Powered by FeedBlitz

Interpreting the Aid Review

This is the archive of a Lowy Institute blog which ran from January to April of 2011. It was published to debate the Gillard Government's independent aid review, which was then in its research and consultation phase. We offer this archive as a service to researchers and the general public.