Saying it with weapons

by Sam Roggeveen - 4 March 2010 8:54AM

Military purchases can be construed differently by various countries; it's all a matter of perspective.

On the sale of French Mistral-class amphibious ships to Russia, London Times reporter Charles Bremner quotes an unnamed former French ambassador as saying, 'It's an empty hull, just the same as a civilian ferry'. Georgian national security advisor Eka Tkeshelashvili has a less benign assessment:

It has great potential of changing the security equation for Russia, though the French have tried to downgrade that. First of all, [the French] frequently cite that it's a humanitarian ship. [But] a ship is a ship. It has great amphibious capacities for carrying arms, helicopters, armed vehicles, soldiers, having a hospital attached to it, or a military headquarters. You can use it for humanitarian purposes if you wish, or you can use it for military purposes.

(H/t Passport.)

Selected Interpreter posts also appear in:

 
Business Spectator Caing online The Diplomat
 

Keep up-to-date with The Interpreter through:

iPhone App   iPhone App

RSS Feed   The Interpreter RSS Feed

Email Digest  

To receive a digest of posts from The Interpreter via email, enter your email address:

Receive a daily digest ->
Receive a weekly digest ->

Preview   |   Powered by FeedBlitz

Interpreting the Aid Review

This is the archive of a Lowy Institute blog which ran from January to April of 2011. It was published to debate the Gillard Government's independent aid review, which was then in its research and consultation phase. We offer this archive as a service to researchers and the general public.