Greens: In the trade policy weeds

by Malcolm Cook - 24 August 2010 2:50PM

This post is part of a debate - click here to see how this debate started and developed.

Andrew Shearer's post on the Greens' foreign policy led me to dig a bit deeper. I chose to look at Greens' statements on Australia's relations with China and their trade policy positions in light of the fact that China is now our largest trading partner (accounting for about one-fifth of our total merchandise trade).

There has been, broadly speaking, support in the ALP and the Coalition for a pragmatic approach to both issues. Unsurprisingly, the Greens have a very different view.

On relations with the People's Republic of China, the Greens strongly criticised PM Rudd for dodging the Dalai Lama and officially objected to the invitation to President Hu Jintao to speak to the joint sitting of Parliament in 2003. Greens leader Bob Brown also questioned the moral legitimacy of Beijing hosting the 2008 Olympics. 

On trade policy, the Greens policy platform calls for Australia to withdraw from existing bilateral trade agreements when possible and supports the abolition of the WTO, IMF and World Bank unless radical reform can democratise their governance. Alas, radical reform and international institutions rarely, if ever, go together.

Photo by Flickr user Roanish, used under a Creative Commons license.

Selected Interpreter posts also appear in:

 
Business Spectator Caing online The Diplomat
 

Keep up-to-date with The Interpreter through:

iPhone App   iPhone App

RSS Feed   The Interpreter RSS Feed

Email Digest  

To receive a digest of posts from The Interpreter via email, enter your email address:

Receive a daily digest ->
Receive a weekly digest ->

Preview   |   Powered by FeedBlitz

Interpreting the Aid Review

This is the archive of a Lowy Institute blog which ran from January to April of 2011. It was published to debate the Gillard Government's independent aid review, which was then in its research and consultation phase. We offer this archive as a service to researchers and the general public.